The Banking Concept
When
reading chapter 8, The Banking Concept of
Education, my mind was blown. I had to re-read line by line just to
understand one concept. But one passage of this chapter stuck out like a sore
thumb to me. “The individual is a spectator; not a re-creator. In this view,
the person is not a conscious being; he or she is rather a possessor of a conscious: an empty “mind” passively
open to the reception of deposits of reality from the outside world.”
This
made me question education in general. Do we just have minds and are fed
information? Is the only purpose for our minds to be told information and for
us not to seek out personally how or what we want to learn? Has my previous
education been robotic? I went to school and sat in a desk for 6 hours looking
at the chalkboard, my textbook and my teacher only. At the end of the day I did
not really have a choice on how I wanted to learn and 50 % of the time I did
not even retain the information. So the big question I wonder with the banking
concept and this quote is “do we have a
choice on how and what we want to learn?”
The
quote above clearly shows that
individuals are something not someone. It does not value the individual and
their interests. It treats them like an object. Think about it, in school the
top of our heads are sliced open and the teacher is just stating information.
The teachers demonstrate they are all knowing and have the authority. The student
is just there to learn to information. But there are many simple solutions to
prevent this type of robotic teaching. In chapter 3, Why Teach?, ties in greatly with opposing the banking concept. To
prevent from students being robots regarding learning, teachers really need to
care and be innovative with their teaching techniques. Teachers should really
ask the question,” why teach?” before they even step foot into the classroom.
They should ask questions like; why do I want to teach?, what kind of young people
do I want to work with, what type of school do I want to work in? “and so on.
The main way to stop the banking concept is to have innovative teachers and curriculum
chose to the student’s minds and liking.
For
students to retain information, it has to be to their interest and in an out of
the box way of learning. In the beginning of the year, I believe teachers
should have set goals but let their class adjust or pick how they want to learn
them. Instead of students sitting in a desk all day and teachers talking,
students should do different learning activities to retain the information.
Whether its hands on, going somewhere, creating something, the lesson should
stick in the student’s minds. The more exciting the lesson is the more the
children will want to learn and retain the information taught. Lastly, teachers
should realize they are also students. To stop the banking concept and students
just being an object to learn, teachers should realize their students can teach
them at the same time. It is a give and take relationship.
I never
truly realized how my education, maybe not to a great extreme, was the banking
concept. For years, I just sat in classrooms and listened to teachers talk. Occasionally,
we would get a movie clip but it was nothing that got me off my feet to learn.
Coming to JCU though was such a change. My professors are very innovative in
their lessons. In Edu. 100, I am retaining so much information because I actually
go OUT of the classroom and get first hand experience. Lastly think the banking
concept is used in many schools, but schools are starting to be more innovating
with teachers. Mercer elementary and Beachwood middle school were absolutely
amazing with their teaching style. The teaching was catered to their student’s
interest. The students did more than just listen to a teacher talk in class. They
would create videos, do hands on work and many more fun learning activities. I think
these schools break away from the baking concept and their students really retain
the knowledge. Overall, I think the baking concept is an old fashion learning style
that may work for some people, but it is not an effective learning style for
most.
Hey Alex,
ReplyDeleteI think you got a point when you tell us that the children aren't robots. To me, we should definitely take in consideration the children and their personality to teach even more efficiently.